Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 2 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 83% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 0 |
Hi my name is Rachel Wanagosit and i believe that the government has not failed in rebuilding the golf coast after hurricane Katrina. This is proven because of the following reasons.
Assertion: Now. Louisiana is ready for a hurricane or any bad storm to hit.
Reasoning: The levees or now much taller than before. Their is hope for many people.
Evidence: according to cnbc.com 14.6 million was spent on levees on the coast. source: nydailynews.com
Assertion: Bush did give money to the owners of houses that were destroyed.
Reasoning:The new hurricane protection is way better than it was before Katrina hit. Many houses have been rebuilt. There is basically no reason to worry.
Evidence: Bush spent a lot of money on all of this.
My name is RAchel Wanagosit and I support the idea the government has not failed in rebuilding the gulf coast after Hurricane Katrina.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |