- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Hi my name is Vishnu Gade and I believe that we SHOULD accept refugees.
Assertion:If Europe doesn't let the refuges in that will cause a lot of deaths from of ISIS.
Reasoning: The people will be forced to hide where they are. Therefore is it esier for ISIS to find refuges and threaten for a ransom.
Evidence: About 4 million people come from Syria to Europe. If Europe doesn't let the people. The majority of the remaining people will be captured.
Hi my name is Vishnu Gade and I strongly believe that the Federal Government has not failed to rebuild the East Coast after Hurricane Katrina.
Assertion: After Hurricane Katrina many people without homes were given enough money to get a house.
Reasoning: HUD, or Housing and Urban Development, has been working very hard to build or rebuild houses for people who have lost homes during natural Disasters.
Evidence: After Hurricane Katrina HUD was given 16.7 million dollars to rebuild homes for the people who have lost their homes during the storm.
Hi my name is Vishnu Gade. I believe the penny shouldn't be abolished.
Assertion: Thing that cost less than 5 cents less than a dollar will cost more.
Reasoning every time you got to a shop the price will go up a lot of you are getting item that cost $50 or more.
Evidence: Say you buy items worth 50$ altogether now. If we abolish the penny the same item will probably cost $53.You might think that's not much. Okay I agree with you. But then what happens when you got to popular retailers. Most of the population buys items worth more than $100 altogether now. If we abolish the penny the same items might cost.$110.
Therefore I know that the opposition side has won the debate.
Hi my name is Vishnu Gade. I strongly do not support the topic that cigarettes should be illegal.
Assertion: It will create a place for cigarettes in the black market
Reasoning:It is a very addictive item if it taken away the black market will not miss the chance.
Evidence: If we make cigarettes illegal, we are giving the black market a chance to make a ton of money. Plus the people who don't have access to the black market might start a war like the drug war. Except way worse.
Therefor I know that the opposition side has won the debate.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!